Randomized Prospective Trial of Epidural Analgesia after Open Hepatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) improves postoperative pain during ambulation following elective open hepatectomy. BACKGROUND: Strategies to alleviate postoperative pain are a critical element of recovery after surgery. However, the optimal postoperative pain management strategy following open hepatectomy remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, nonblinded, randomized comparison of PCEA (intervention) versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA; control) for postoperative pain following elective open hepatectomy. The primary end point was pain during ambulation on postoperative day (POD) 2. The study was powered to detect a clinically significant 2-point difference on the pain numeric rating scale (NRS). Secondary end points included pain at rest, morbidity, time to return of bowel function, and length of stay. RESULTS: From 2015 to 2020, 231 patients were randomized (116 patients in the PCEA arm and 115 in the IV PCA arm). The incidence of epidural failure was 3% (n=4/116), with no epidural-related complications. Patients in the PCEA arm had a <2-point difference in NRS pain scores during ambulation on POD 2 vs. IV PCA (median 4.0 vs. 5.0, P <0.001). There was no difference in overall complications between the PCEA and IV PCA arms (33% vs. 40%, P =0.276). Secondary outcomes, including pain scores at rest, were similar between the study arms. CONCLUSIONS: PCEA was safe following open hepatectomy and was associated with a small difference in pain with activity on POD 2 that did not reach our pre-specified definition of clinical significance.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition Activates Intratumoral γδ T Cells in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.

γδ T cells are a rare but potent subset of T cells with pleiotropic functions. They commonly reside within tumors but the response of γδ T cells to tyrosine kinase inhibition is unknown. To address this, we studied a genetically engineered mouse model of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) driven by oncogenic Kit signaling that responds to the Kit inhibitor imatinib. At baseline, γδ T cells were antitumoral, as blockade of either γδ T-cell receptor or IL17A increased tumor weight and decreased antitumor immunity. However, imatinib therapy further stimulated intratumoral γδ T cells, as determined by flow cytometry and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). Imatinib expanded a highly activated γδ T-cell subset with increased IL17A production and higher expression of immune checkpoints and cytolytic effector molecules. Consistent with the mouse model, γδ T cells produced IL17A in fresh human GIST specimens, and imatinib treatment increased γδ T-cell gene signatures, as measured by bulk tumor RNA-seq. Furthermore, tumor γδ T cells correlated with survival in patients with GIST. Our findings highlight the interplay between tumor cell oncogene signaling and antitumor immune responses and identify γδ T cells as targets for immunotherapy in GIST.

Transforming the Future of Surgeon-Scientists.

OBJECTIVE: To create a blueprint for surgical department leaders, academic institutions, and funding agencies to optimally support surgeon-scientists. BACKGROUND: Scientific contributions by surgeons have been transformative across many medical disciplines. Surgeon-scientists provide a distinct approach and mindset toward key scientific questions. However, lack of institutional support, pressure for increased clinical productivity, and growing administrative burden are major challenges for the surgeon-scientist, as is the time-consuming nature of surgical training and practice. METHODS: An American Surgical Association Research Sustainability Task Force was created to outline a blueprint for sustainable science in surgery. Leaders from top NIH-sponsored departments of surgery engaged in video and in-person meetings between January and April 2023. A strength, weakness, opportunities, threats analysis was performed, and workgroups focused on the roles of surgeons, the department and institutions, and funding agencies. RESULTS: Taskforce recommendations: (1) SURGEONS: Growth mindset : identifying research focus, long-term planning, patience/tenacity, team science, collaborations with disparate experts; Skill set : align skills and research, fill critical skill gaps, develop team leadership skills; DEPARTMENT OF SURGERY (DOS): (2) MENTORSHIP: Chair : mentor-mentee matching/regular meetings/accountability, review of junior faculty progress, mentorship training requirement, recognition of mentorship (eg, relative value unit equivalent, awards; Mentor: dedicated time, relevant scientific expertise, extramural funding, experience and/or trained as mentor, trusted advisor; Mentee : enthusiastic/eager, proactive, open to feedback, clear about goals; (3) FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY: diversification of research portfolio, identification of matching funding sources, departmental resource awards (eg, T-/P-grants), leveraging of institutional resources, negotiation of formalized/formulaic funds flow investment from academic medical center toward science, philanthropy; (4) STRUCTURAL/STRATEGIC SUPPORT: Structural: grants administrative support, biostats/bioinformatics support, clinical trial and research support, regulatory support, shared departmental laboratory space/equipment; Strategic: hiring diverse surgeon-scientist/scientists faculty across DOS, strategic faculty retention/ recruitment, philanthropy, career development support, progress tracking, grant writing support, DOS-wide research meetings, regular DOS strategic research planning; (5) COMMUNITY AND CULTURE: Community: right mix of faculty, connection surgeon with broad scientific community; Culture: building research infrastructure, financial support for research, projecting importance of research (awards, grand rounds, shoutouts); (6) THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS: Foundation: research space co-location, flexible start-up packages, courses/mock study section, awards, diverse institutional mentorship teams; Nurture: institutional infrastructure, funding (eg, endowed chairs), promotion friendly toward surgeon-scientists, surgeon-scientists in institutional leadership positions; Expectations: RVU target relief, salary gap funding, competitive starting salaries, longitudinal salary strategy; (7) THE ROLE OF FUNDING AGENCIES: change surgeon research training paradigm, offer alternate awards to K-awards, increasing salary cap to reflect market reality, time extension for surgeon early-stage investigator status, surgeon representation on study section, focused award strategies for professional societies/foundations. CONCLUSIONS: Authentic recommitment from surgeon leaders with intentional and ambitious actions from institutions, corporations, funders, and society is essential in order to reap the essential benefits of surgeon-scientists toward advancements of science.

Multiple intratumoral sources of kit ligand promote gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common human sarcoma and is typically driven by a single mutation in the Kit or PDGFRA receptor. While highly effective, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are not curative. The natural ligand for the Kit receptor is Kit ligand (KitL), which exists in both soluble and membrane-bound forms. While KitL is known to stimulate human GIST cell lines in vitro, we used a genetically engineered mouse model of GIST containing a common human KIT mutation to investigate the intratumoral sources of KitL, importance of KitL during GIST oncogenesis, and contribution of soluble KitL to tumor growth in vivo. We discovered that in addition to tumor cells, endothelia and smooth muscle cells produced KitL in KitV558Δ/+ tumors, even after imatinib therapy. Genetic reduction of total KitL in tumor cells of KitV558Δ/+ mice impaired tumor growth in vivo. Similarly, genetic reduction of tumor cell soluble KitL in KitV558Δ/+ mice decreased tumor size. By RNA sequencing, quantitative PCR, and immunohistochemistry, KitL expression was heterogeneous in human GIST specimens. In particular, PDGFRA-mutant tumors had much higher KitL expression than Kit-mutant tumors, suggesting the benefit of Kit activation in the absence of mutant KIT. Serum KitL was higher in GIST patients with tumors resistant to imatinib and in those with tumors expressing more KitL RNA. Overall, KitL supports the growth of GIST at baseline and after imatinib therapy and remains a potential biomarker and therapeutic target.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A National Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Management of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) remains controversial, with the mainstay of treatment being surgery. While neoadjuvant radiation demonstrated no improvement in recurrence-free survival in a prospective randomized trial (STRASS), the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) remains unknown and is the subject of ongoing study (STRASS2). METHODS: Patients who underwent surgical resection of high-grade RP leiomyosarcoma (LMS) or dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS) were identified from the National Cancer Database (2006-2019). Predictors of NCT were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Differences in 5-year survival were examined using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method and by Cox proportional hazard modeling. RESULTS: A total of 2656 patients met inclusion criteria. Fifty-seven percent of patients had DDLS and 43.5% had LMS. Six percent of patients underwent NCT. Patients who received NCT were younger (median age 60 vs 64 years, p < 0.001) and more likely to have LMS (OR 1.4, p = 0.04). In comparing NCT with no-NCT patients, there was no difference in 5-year overall survival (OS) on KM analysis (57.3% vs 52.8%, p = 0.38), nor was any difference seen after propensity matching (54.9% vs 49.1%, p = 0.48, N = 144 per group). When stratified by histology, there was no difference in OS based on receipt of NCT (LMS: 59.8% for NCT group, 56.6% for no-NCT, p = 0.34; DDLS: 54.2% for NCT group, 50.1% for no-NCT, p = 0.99). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing surgical resection of RP LMS or DDLS, NCT does not appear to confer an OS advantage. Prospective randomized data from STRASS2 will confirm or refute these retrospective data.

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on Patients Undergoing Elective Spine Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a prospective, randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in an elective spine surgery population. BACKGROUND: Surgical outcomes such as length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and opioid utilization greatly contribute to patient satisfaction and societal healthcare costs. ERAS protocols are multimodal, patient-centered care pathways shown to reduce postoperative opioid use, reduced LOS, and improved ambulation; however, prospective ERAS data are limited in spine surgery. METHODS: This single-center, institutional review board-approved, prospective RCT-enrolled adult patients undergoing elective spine surgery between March 2019 and October 2020. Primary outcomes were perioperative and 1-month postoperative opioid use. Patients were randomized to ERAS (n=142) or standard-of-care (SOC; n=142) based on power analyses to detect a difference in postoperative opioid use. RESULTS: Opioid use during hospitalization and the first postoperative month was not significantly different between groups (ERAS 112.2 vs SOC 117.6 morphine milligram equivalent, P =0.76; ERAS 38.7% vs SOC 39.4%, P =1.00, respectively). However, patients randomized to ERAS were less likely to use opioids at 6 months postoperatively (ERAS 11.4% vs SOC 20.6%, P =0.046) and more likely to be discharged to home after surgery (ERAS 91.5% vs SOC 81.0%, P =0.015). CONCLUSION: Here, we present a novel ERAS prospective RCT in the elective spine surgery population. Although we do not detect a difference in the primary outcome of short-term opioid use, we observe significantly reduced opioid use at 6-month follow-up as well as an increased likelihood of home disposition after surgery in the ERAS group.

Surgical Management of Germline Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common human sarcoma and usually results from a sporadic mutation in KIT or, less frequently, platelet-derived growth factor alpha (PDGFRA). Rarely, a germline mutation in the KIT, PDGFRA, succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), or neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) gene is responsible for GIST. These tumors are found in the stomach (PDGFRA and SDH), small bowel (NF1), or a combination of both (KIT). There is a need to improve care for these patients regarding genetic testing, screening, and surveillance. Since most GISTs due to a germline mutation do not respond to tyrosine kinase inhibitors, the role of surgery is critical, especially when considering germline gastric GIST. However, in contrast to the established recommendation for prophylactic total gastrectomy in cadherin 1 (CDH1) mutation carriers once they reach adulthood, there are no formal guidelines as to the timing or extent of surgical resection for patients who are either carriers of a germline GIST mutation causing gastric GIST or have already developed gastric GIST(s). Surgeons must balance treating what is often multicentric, yet initially indolent disease with the chance of cure and the complications associated with total gastrectomy. Here, we consider the major issues in performing surgery in patients with germline GIST and illustrate the principles with a previously unreported patient harboring a germline KIT 579 deletion.

Myosin Light-Chain Kinase Inhibition Potentiates the Antitumor Effects of Avapritinib in PDGFRA D842V-Mutant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.

PURPOSE: To create an in vivo model of PDGFRA D842V-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and identify the mechanism of tumor persistence following avapritinib therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We created a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) of PDGFRA D842V-mutant GIST and tested the effects of imatinib, avapritinib, and ML-7, an inhibitor of myosin light-chain kinase (MYLK). Bulk tumor RNA sequencing and oncogenic signaling were evaluated. Apoptosis, survival, and actin cytoskeleton were evaluated in GIST T1 cells and isolated PDX cells in vitro. Human GIST specimens were analyzed for MYLK expression. RESULTS: The PDX was minimally responsive to imatinib but sensitive to avapritinib. Avapritinib therapy increased tumor expression of genes related to the actin cytoskeleton, including MYLK. ML-7 induced apoptosis and disrupted actin filaments in short-term cultures of PDX cells and decreased survival in GIST T1 cells in combination with imatinib or avapritinib. Combined therapy with ML-7 improved the antitumor effects of low-dose avapritinib in vivo. Furthermore, MYLK was expressed in human GIST specimens. CONCLUSIONS: MYLK upregulation is a novel mechanism of tumor persistence after tyrosine kinase inhibition. Concomitant MYLK inhibition may enable the use of a lower dose of avapritinib, which is associated with dose-dependent cognitive side effects.

Immunotherapy for GI Malignancies, Ready for Prime Time?

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers include esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, hepatobiliary, and colorectal malignancies. Immunotherapy has proved to be an important treatment method for cancer, and its use for a wide range of GI malignancies has been evaluated recently. This article discusses the type and mechanism of various immunotherapies under investigation in GI cancer. The study also reviews recent clinical trials, with a particular focus on overall survival, and discusses their achievements and limitations. Immunotherapy has shown efficacy for microsatellite instability high colorectal cancer and some promise in some gastroesophageal junction and gastric cancers. Meanwhile, it has not been effective for pancreatic or neuroendocrine tumors. The identification of novel biomarkers likely will guide selection of therapy for individual patients. Nevertheless, immunotherapy for GI cancers is in its infancy, and many other classes of immune therapies are being developed besides anti-PD1 and anti-PDL1. Thus, although immunotherapy has not seen a dramatic advance to date, it still has great potential.

The financial impact of COVID-19 on a surgical department: The effects of surgical shutdowns and the impact on a health system.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in sweeping shutdowns of surgical operations to increase hospital capacity and conserve resources. Our institution, following national and state guidelines, suspended nonessential surgeries from March 16 to May 4, 2020. This study examines the financial impact of this decision on our institution's health system by comparing 2 waves of COVID-19 cases. METHODS: The total revenue was obtained for surgical cases occurring during the first wave of the pandemic between March 1, 2020 and July 31, 2020 and the second wave between October 1, 2020 and February 29, 2021 for all surgical departments. During the same time intervals, in the prepandemic year 2019, total revenue was also obtained for comparison. Net revenue and work relative value units per month were compared to each respective month for all surgical divisions within the department of surgery. RESULTS: Comparing the 5-month first wave period in 2020 to prepandemic 2019 for all surgical departments, there was a net revenue loss of $99,674,376, which reflected 42% of the health system's revenue loss during this period. The department of surgery contributed to a net revenue loss of $58,368,951, which was 24.9% of the health system's revenue loss. Within the department of surgery, there was a significant difference between the net revenue loss per month per division of the first and second wave: first wave median -$636,952 [interquartile range: -1,432,627; 26,111] and second wave median -$274,626 [-781,124; 396,570] (P = .04). A similar difference was detected when comparing percent change in work relative value units between the 2 waves (wave 1: median -13.2% [interquartile range: -41.3%, -1.8%], wave 2: median -7.8% [interquartile range: -13.0%, 1.8%], P = .003). CONCLUSION: Stopping elective surgeries significantly decreased revenue for a health system. Losses for the health system totaled $234,839,990 during the first wave, with lost surgical revenue comprising 42% of that amount. With elective surgeries continuing during the second wave of COVID-19 cases, the health system losses were substantially lower. The contribution surgery has to a hospital's cash flow is essential in maintaining financial solvency. It is important for hospital systems to develop innovative and alternative solutions to increase capacity, offer comprehensive care to medical and surgical patients, and prevent shutdowns of surgical activity through a pandemic to maintain financial security.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition Alters Intratumoral CD8+ T-cell Subtype Composition and Activity.

Targeted therapy with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) such as imatinib is effective in treating gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), but it is rarely curative. Despite the presence of a robust immune CD8+ T-cell infiltrate, combining a TKI with immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) in advanced GIST has achieved only modest effects. To identify limitations imposed by imatinib on the antitumor immune response, we performed bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), single-cell RNA-seq, and flow cytometry to phenotype CD8+ T-cell subsets in a genetically engineered mouse model of GIST. Imatinib reduced the frequency of effector CD8+ T cells and increased the frequency of naïve CD8+ T cells within mouse GIST, which coincided with altered tumor chemokine production, CD8+ T-cell recruitment, and reduced CD8+ T-cell intracellular PI3K signaling. Imatinib also failed to induce intratumoral T-cell receptor (TCR) clonal expansion. Consistent with these findings, human GISTs sensitive to imatinib harbored fewer effector CD8+ T cells but more naïve CD8+ T cells. Combining an IL15 superagonist (IL15SA) with imatinib restored intratumoral effector CD8+ T-cell function and CD8+ T-cell intracellular PI3K signaling, resulting in greater tumor destruction. Combination therapy with IL15SA and ICB resulted in the greatest tumor killing and maintained an effector CD8+ T-cell population in the presence of imatinib. Our findings highlight the impact of oncogene inhibition on intratumoral CD8+ T cells and support the use of agonistic T-cell therapy during TKI and/or ICB administration.

The GIST of Advances in Treatment of Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common malignant neoplasm of mesenchymal origin and a compelling clinical and biologic model for the rational development of molecularly targeted agents. This is because the majority of GISTs are driven by gain-of-function mutations in KIT or PDGFRA receptor tyrosine kinases. Specific GIST mutations circumscribe well-defined molecular subgroups that must be determined during the diagnostic work-up to guide clinical management, including therapeutic decisions. Surgery is the cornerstone treatment in localized disease and can also be clinically relevant in the metastatic setting. The correct combination and sequence of targeted agents and surgical procedures improves outcomes for patients with GIST and should be discussed individually within multidisciplinary expert teams. All currently approved agents for the treatment of GIST are based on orally available tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting KIT and PDGFRA oncogenic activation. Although first-line imatinib achieves remarkable prolonged disease control, the benefit of subsequent lines of treatment is more modest. Novel therapeutic strategies focus on overcoming the heterogeneity of KIT or PDGFRA secondary mutations and providing more potent inhibition of specific challenging mutations. This article reviews the current understanding and treatment of GIST, with an emphasis on recent advances.

Fourteen years of pancreatic surgery for malignancy among ACS-NSQIP centers: Trends in major morbidity and mortality.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was established to help participating hospitals track and report surgical complications with the goal of improving surgical care. We sought to determine whether this has led to improvements in surgical outcomes for pancreatic malignancies. METHODS: Patients with pancreatic malignancies who underwent surgical resection were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2006-2019). Thirty-day postoperative major morbidity and mortality were analyzed by year. Major morbidity included organ and deep surgical site infection, venous thromboembolism, cardiac event, pneumonia, acute renal failure, sepsis, and respiratory failure. RESULTS: Of the 28,888 patients identified, 51% were male, the median age was 68, 74.3% underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy, and 25.7% underwent a distal pancreatectomy. Among patients who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy, there was a significant increase in major morbidity (annual percent change 0.77, P = .012) driven by increases in organ space surgical site infection (annual percent change 3.52, P < .001) and venous thromboembolism (annual percent change 4.72, P = .005). However, there was a decrease in postoperative mortality (annual percent change -4.58, P = .001). For distal pancreatectomy patients, there was no change in rates of overall major morbidity (annual percent change -1.35, P = .08) or mortality (annual percent change -3.21, P = .25). CONCLUSION: Although major morbidity and mortality have not significantly changed for distal pancreatectomy patients, mortality has steadily decreased for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, despite an increase in major morbidity. Whether this trend reflects a change in patient selection, an increase in detection of postoperative morbidities and/or an improvement in mitigation of these morbidities warrants further study.

Molecular and Immunologic Techniques in a Genetically Engineered Mouse Model of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common human sarcoma and is typically driven by a single mutation in the KIT receptor. Across tumor types, numerous mouse models have been developed in order to investigate the next generation of cancer therapies. However, in GIST, most in vivo studies use xenograft mouse models which have inherent limitations. Here, we describe an immunocompetent, genetically engineered mouse model of gastrointestinal stromal tumor harboring a KitV558Δ/+ mutation. In this model, mutant KIT, the oncogene responsible for most GISTs, is driven by its endogenous promoter leading to a GIST which mimics the histological appearance and immune infiltrate seen in human GISTs. Furthermore, this model has been used successfully to investigate both targeted molecular and immune therapies. Here, we describe the breeding and maintenance of a KitV558Δ/+ mouse colony. Additionally, this paper details the treatment and procurement of GIST, draining mesenteric lymph node, and adjacent cecum in KitV558Δ/+ mice, as well as sample preparation for molecular and immunologic analyses.

Surgical resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) in octogenarians.

BACKGROUND: Localized gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare tumors typically managed with surgery, but outcomes among octogenarians remain less studied. METHODS: Octogenarian patients with stage I-III gastric GISTs were identified from the National Cancer Database and classified by resection status. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses analyzed 5-year overall survival (OS). Ninety-day mortality was analyzed following 1:1 propensity score matching. RESULTS: Identified octogenarians (N = 949) who underwent resection (N = 632) had improved adjusted OS (71% vs 59.6%, HR 0.75, p 0.049) as compared to non-resected patients. Following matching, 90-day mortality was 5.7% and 11% in resected and non-resected patients (p 0.052), respectively. After exclusion of patients with 90-day mortality, resected patients maintained an OS advantage (77.3% vs 71.1%, HR 0.64, p 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of octogenarians with localized gastric GIST are treated with surgery portending improved survival but an appreciable mortality, suggesting a necessity for careful selection of older patients for surgery.

Are Volume Pledge Standards Worth the Travel Burden for Major Abdominal Cancer Operations?

OBJECTIVE: The study objective is to determine the association between travel distance and surgical volume on outcomes after esophageal, pancreatic, and rectal cancer resections. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: "Take the Volume Pledge" aims to centralize esophagectomies, pancreatectomies, and proctectomies to hospitals meeting minimum volume standards. The impact of travel, and possible care fragmentation, on potential benefits of centralized surgery is not well understood. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database (2004-2016), patients who underwent esophageal, pancreatic, or rectal resections at far HVH meeting volume standards versus local intermediate (IVH) and low-volume (LVH) hospitals were identified. Perioperative outcomes and 5-year OS were compared. RESULTS: Of 49,454 patients, 17,544 (34.5%) underwent surgery at far HVH, 11,739 (23.7%) at local IVH, and 20,171 (40.8%) at local LVH. The median (interquartilerange) travel distances were 77.1 (51.1-125.4), 13.2 (5.8-27.3), and 7.8 (3.1-15.5) miles to HVH, IVH, and LVH, respectively. By multivariable analysis, LVH was associated with increased 30-day mortality for all resections compared to HVH, but IVH was associated with mortality only for proctectomies [odds ratio 1.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31-2.75]. Compared to HVH, both IVH (hazard ratio 1.25, 95% CI 1.19-1.31) and LVH (hazard ratio 1.35, 95% CI 1.29-1.42) were associated with decreased 5-year OS. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to far HVH, 30-day mortality was higher for all resections at LVH, but only for proctectomies at IVH. Five-year OS was consistently worse at local LVH and IVH. Improving long-term outcomes at IVH may provide opportunities for greater access to quality cancer care.